International Journal Political, Law, and Social Science

DECONSTRUCTING THE NORTH SOUTH DIVIDE AND THE FRAGILITY OF REGIONAL PRODUCTIVITY DYNAMICS IN THE POST BREXIT UNITED KINGDOM

2026-03-14T00:32:20+00:00

This research investigates the structural fragmentation of the United Kingdom’s economic landscape, specifically evaluating the efficacy of the "Levelling Up" framework in addressing entrenched regional disparities. While the UK remains a global financial powerhouse, it is simultaneously characterized by a persistent "productivity puzzle" and one of the highest levels of regional inequality among OECD nations. Utilizing a multi-dimensional analysis of Gross Value Added (GVA) and spatial economic data, this article explores how the transition to a post-Brexit regulatory environment and the pursuit of a "Net Zero" industrial strategy have influenced regional growth trajectories. The findings suggest that existing top-down interventions have struggled to counteract the historical "London-centric" economic gravitation, further complicated by labor market frictions and underinvestment in sub-national infrastructure. This study argues that a fundamental recalibration of fiscal devolution and localized industrial policy is essential to bridge the productivity gap. By analyzing the tensions between national growth objectives and regional equity, this research contributes to the broader discourse on developmental trajectories within advanced neoliberal economies facing deindustrialization and political realignment.

CODIFICATION OF ELECTORAL AND LOCAL ELECTION LAWS AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR STRENGTHENING DEMOCRACY IN INDONESIA

2026-04-12T14:09:51+00:00

This research is based on the analysis of three primary issues concerning the codification of the Law on General and Local Elections (Pemilu and Pilkada) as part of the efforts to build democracy in Indonesia. These issues include: First, how the concept and form of codification of the Election and Local Election Laws are viewed from the perspective of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; Second, what the legal implications of such codification are for the national election legal system; and Third, how the direction of Indonesia's democratic legal policy supports codification as a strategy for national legal reform. The research method employs a normative legal approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results indicate that codification is a constitutional necessity to unify election norms scattered across various regulations, aimed at creating legal certainty, efficiency, and regulatory consistency. An open codification model is considered the most suitable for Indonesia's pluralistic character, as it provides room for flexibility without compromising the harmonization of the legal system. Furthermore, codification serves as a concrete manifestation of democratic legal policy that upholds the principles of the rule of law and public participation in a fair and democratic electoral system. This study aims to formulate the theoretical and juridical foundations for the codification of the Election and Local Election Laws as an integral part of Indonesia's democratic development. The findings offer a concept of open codification grounded in the principles of constitutionality, legal system integration, and responsiveness to political dynamics and societal needs. Through a comprehensive electoral law codification model, this research contributes to the strengthening of a democratic national legal system, ensuring citizens' political rights, and improving the quality of election implementation in Indonesia in a just and sustainable manner.

ASSESSING THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF FLOOD DISASTERS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

2026-04-22T23:16:10+00:00

This research examines the legal implications of flood disasters concerning the protection of environmental human rights within the framework of sustainable development. The primary focus of this study is to address three research problems: first, whether flood disasters can be categorized as an unlawful act by the government (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad) that constitutes a violation of environmental human rights; second, whether flood disasters are considered a form of environmental degradation under governmental responsibility and whether citizens possess legal standing (jus standi) as victims; and third, what constitutes an effective legal protection model for flood victims within the concept of sustainable development. The methodology employed is normative legal research utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. This study analyzes regulations, legal concepts, and policy implementation related to flood disaster management and environmental human rights protection. The findings indicate that the government bears legal liability for flood risk management, and negligence in this regard can be deemed an unlawful act that prejudices public rights. Furthermore, flood victims have the right to file lawsuits against the government to ensure the protection of the right to a healthy and safe environment. This research also formulates a legal protection model that integrates sustainable development principles as the foundation for disaster management and the protection of victims' rights.